Affordable Housing Finance
FINANCE
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
Next Generation of GSEs
AFFORDABLE HOUSING FINANCE
• June 2010
Questions emerge about the future of Fannie and
Freddie as well as their roles in affordable housing
BY JERRY ASCIERTO
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
have played a vital role in the
affordable housing world, but
the government-sponsored
enterprises (GSEs) are an endangered
species.
As Congress begins to remake the
nation’s housing finance system, one of
the biggest issues is to what extent the
next generation will play in the affordable
housing arena.
All options, at this point, are on the
table. “I don’t think anything is immune
from being reengineered,” says Sheila
Crowley, president of the Washington,
D.C.-based National Low Income
Housing Coalition (NLIHC). “The whole
system, including the Federal Home
Loan Banks and the Federal Housing
Administration (FHA), is up for review
at this point.”
The right wing in Congress wants a
fully private market and to make affordable
housing efforts the FHA’s domain.
The left wing wants the next generation
of government-chartered entities to concentrate
only on affordable housing and
remain largely in the government’s control.
But a hybrid system incorporating
elements of both is much more likely.
In analyzing proposals—from the
Cato Institute, the Center for American
Progress, the Mortgage Bankers
Association (MBA), the National Multi
Housing Council (NMHC), and the
National Apartment Association—a
way forward is emerging. Here are
three general points of consensus that
will likely survive the debate.
1. Multiplicity
The housing finance system of tomorrow
will include several new government-
chartered entities, built on the
ruins of the GSEs. These entities will all
be private companies, capitalized with
private equity. As such, the entities can
fail like any other private company. But a
regulator modeled on the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corp. will be able to put them
into conservatorship if necessary.
Having several entities ensures that
none of them are too big to fail, and it
might bring more attention to underserved
parts of the market, such as small
properties. While Fannie Mae has a dedicated
small loan program, Freddie Mac
is less interested in anything small. Yet a
large portion of the nation’s multifamily
stock needs loans of under $2 million.
“No one at the national level, neither
Fannie, Freddie, nor the FHA,
has been able to address financing for
smaller properties,” says Buzz Roberts,
a senior vice president for policy at the
Local Initiatives Support Corp. “It’s great
if Fannie can go down to $1 million, but
we need more than just one way to go.
Competition encourages innovation and
better pricing.”
The fledgling entities will be hungry
to build up a market niche, Roberts says,
and if an entity is a fraction of the size of
Fannie Mae, small loans might look like
a more attractive business line.
But having multifamily-specific
entities is unlikely. “Capital markets like
the brand comfort of the much larger
market that is single-family,” says Sarah
Rosen Wartell, executive vice president
for the Washington, D.C.-based Center
for American Progress. “So, if you take
the rental market and put it in separate
institutions, you actually may increase
the cost of capital.”
2. Government guarantee
These chartered mortgage issuers
will likely have access to an explicit
government guarantee for the securities
they issue, much like the Ginnie Mae
structure of securitizing FHA-insured
loans. And that guarantee will have a few
strings attached to it, namely a public
mission and a price tag.
“More of the loans will be securitized,
and there will be some public mission
tied to it,” predicts David Cardwell,
vice president of capital markets for the
NMHC. “Luxury properties will probably
not be looking to the GSEs the way
they are today. But how you define luxury
is going to be the $64,000 question.”
The NLIHC naturally hopes to see deeper affordability goals than were
previously imposed on the GSEs. The
lowest income level the GSEs are required
to serve is 50 percent of the area
median income (AMI). “That’s all well
and good, but there’s no shortage of
rental housing for people at 50 percent
of AMI and above,” says Crowley. “The
shortage is for 30 percent of AMI and
below, and in some markets, between
30 and 50 percent.”
The government guarantee won’t be
provided for free: The entities will pay for
it in the form of fees or additional basis
points built into the interest rate of each
loan. Those fees will be collected in a reserve
to protect against losses, and some
portion of those fees might be diverted to
support affordable housing initiatives.
The guarantee will help these entities
provide countercyclical liquidity, to
serve the market in good times and bad.
When the rest of the market is healthy, the
entities will see a reduced market share.
And when the private market craters, the
entities will scale up. Importantly, the
guarantee would also ensure a lower cost
of capital in times of illiquidity.
“It’s possible, and almost very highly
likely, that with industry support and public
policy support, some kind of government
guarantee for a preferred portion of
the market will revive,” says Wartell.
3. Portfolio capacity
These entities will focus on securitization
first and foremost. They will
have very limited portfolio capacity, just
enough to warehouse loans pre-securitization
and to offer mortgages that don’t
have broad investor interest. As such,
there may also be some level of government
guarantee on the portfolio.
The GSEs have a wide range of products,
not all of which can be securitized.
This is particularly true in the affordable
housing space, where tax-exempt bond
credit enhancements, or forward commitments
on tax credit properties, are
still portfolio executions.
“There should be some portfolio
availability for highly structured transactions,
and specifically in the affordable
multifamily sphere,” says Michael
Berman, chairman-elect of the MBA and
CEO of agency lender CWCapital. “But
the total portfolio now is something like
$1.5 trillion, and we don’t even need a
peppercorn compared to that.”
Miles to go
So much is still up in the air. Will
the entities be existing companies or
brand-new organizations? What level of
government involvement is necessary to
ensure liquidity and stability? How many
entities will there be? Will they all do the
same thing? Is it regional or national?
“The biggest question mark is
the transition from here to there,” says
Shekar Narasimhan, a managing partner
of McLean, Va.-based Beekman
Advisors. “Once we agree on the form,
how long does it take to go from what exists
today to that new form?”
|