Affordable Housing Finance
SPECIAL FOCUS
AHF's How-To Guide
Being Compliant
AFFORDABLE HOUSING FINANCE
• March 2009
Double-checking details and regulations
can keep property managers on track
BY RUTH THEOBALD PROBST
The Sec. 42 tax credit program
is more than 20 years old. It
would be nice to think our
compliance challenges were
behind us, but that’s not the
case. Here are the top challenges owners
and property managers still face.
Households over income
It’s still the math that trips most
properties up at move-in—inadequate
documentation and missing information
on verifications.
Have someone check all of the documentation
and then double-check the
math before approving a family for movein.
If someone isn’t reviewing each
move-in application before
the management agent hands out keys, it
can return to haunt the project later.
Changing regulations
Over the past two years, our understanding
of Sec. 42 compliance has
changed dramatically. Some rules we
used to believe were written in stone simply
vanished, leaving us stunned. Others
that we never knew were there suddenly
became visible. And that’s just at the federal
level. States also have adapted their
policies, and there are plenty of variations
of which to keep track.
Stick with the rules as they have been
applied in the past until you have written
guidance from the state and owner/agent.
Remember that the investor may have an
opinion as to how the project operates.
Understanding building vs. project
Of all the rules in Sec. 42, this has
probably gone through the most signifi
cant transformation. In the good old
days, if any household wanted to transfer
to a unit in a different building they
had to re-income qualify. This rule began
to transform with the publication
of Revenue Rule 2004-82 and was then
clarified in the 2007 publication of the
8823 Guide.
The transfer of lowincome
families between
buildings is now permissible
for 100 percent lowincome
housing tax credit
(LIHTC) buildings and
permissible for mixed
buildings, but subject to a
review of the family’s most
recent recertification. As
long as their income was
below the 140 percent threshold at that
time, the transfer is allowed.
But now that transfer between buildings
is permissible, a new question arises.
Is that building the household wants
to transfer to really a building for tax
credit purposes, or is it a project? Only
the building’s 8609 form can instruct a
management agent on that definition.
Line 10b makes all the difference as to
whether or not families can transfer between
buildings in a project. If the owner
did not elect to make each building part
of a multiple-building project, then each
building in the “project” is really its own
project (got that?), and of course transfers
cannot be permitted between projects.
Get copies of the 8609s for each
building in the project and determine
the building’s status based on line 10b or
conservatively treat each building as its
own project and do not allow transfers
outside the building unless the family
would income-qualify at move-in.
Managing multiple programs
on one LIHTC project
The layers of financing for one
LIHTC project now number eight or
more. Often the intricate details of the
program overlays escape the scrutiny of
the development team if they are focused
on closing the deal without regard for
how these multiple programs will work
together out in the field. This leaves the
bulk of the responsibility on the management
agent.
Have someone on the management
agent’s staff that has worked inside these
multiple programs or understands them
well enough to monitor the requirements.
Read the regulatory agreements.
Look for potential discrepancies or points
of conflict and have a plan to deal with
them before opening the project. State
agencies often offer instruction on various
programs.
Ruth Theobald Probst, CPM, HCCP,
SHCM is president and CEO of The
TheoPRO Group, which specializes in
Sec. 42 compliance. In 2008, TheoPRO
formed TheoPRO Asset Advisors to enhance
the successful operation of Sec. 42
properties. For more information, visit
www.theopro.com.
|