Affordable Housing Finance
SPECIAL FOCUS
The AHF 50
Staying
Power
AFFORDABLE HOUSING FINANCE
• April/May 2009
Power
Developers confront
tough conditions
BY DONNA KIMURA
DEVELOPERS TALK BACK
• The Top 50 developers started 23,428 affordable
housing units in 224 projects across
the country in 2008.
• Average price received for 9 percent lowincome
housing tax credits in 2008: $0.88
Average price expected for the same type of
deal in 2009:
$0.75
• Average operating cost per unit per annum $4,789
• Approximate construction cost per square
foot for a new project:
Garden-style $106 Mid-rise — $156 Attached townhome — $111
• Developers are taking different steps
to cope with the economic downturn.
(Developers were responding to an open-ended
question and may have listed multiple answers.)
Increasing collections/cutting expenses
—
23 percent
Meeting with partners and/or aligning projects
with partners’ criteria —
16 percent
Hiring or compensation freeze —
12 percent
Increasing scrutiny of proposed projects
—
11 percent
Tightening underwriting/increasing due
diligence —
7 percent
Concentrating on strong markets or most
viable projects —
6 percent
• The lack of low-income housing tax credit
capital is affecting developers in several ways.
(Developers were responding to an open-ended
question and may have listed multiple answers.)
Reducing or slowing the pipeline of new
projects or acquisitions —
30 percent
Concentrating on the strong markets and projects
that appeal to investors —
21 percent
Seeking other funding sources —
10 percent
Value-engineering deals —
4 percent
About the survey
Responses are from a survey of 94 affordable
housing developers conducted by AFFORDABLE
HOUSING FINANCE in February 2009.
This year’s Top 50 developers
started 23,428 affordable housing
units in 2008. Each one has
some extra sweat and maybe a
tear or two on them.
Developers put these deals in play in a
brutal year marked by melting equity prices,
tightening underwriting, and growing
uncertainty in the economy and the real
estate market.
Perhaps a sign of the difficult times,
the number of units started is a notable
23 percent drop from the affordable units
started in 2007 by last year’s group of
ranked firms.
Completions also fell by roughly 17
percent, with this year’s Top 50 delivering
21,385 affordable homes in 2008.
The overall drop in starts isn’t a surprise
given the turmoil in the equity markets,
says David O. Deutch, a partner at
Pinnacle Housing Group in Miami, the
No. 16 developer on this year’s list, with
589 units started.
“It continues to be difficult because of
a lack of capital,” he says.
Despite the troubles, the industry is in
a better position than it was a few months
ago, according to Deutch, who hopes to
start several more projects this year. “I’m
cautiously optimistic that the stimulus
[bill] is going to have the intended consequences
of allowing deals to move forward
and get built,” he says.
The recently signed American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act features
several provisions aimed at jump-starting
stalled low-income housing tax credit
(LIHTC) projects and reviving the anemic
tax credit market. Nearly all of the units
cited in the Top 50 list are financed with
LIHTCs.
Other developers are also surprisingly
optimistic. The Top 50 firms estimate that
they will start 26,131 affordable housing
units this year, which, if realized, would
be a nearly 12 percent jump from 2008.
They also hope to complete 23,439 units,
a 10 percent increase from what they completed
last year.
The only list of its kind, the AHF 50
shows how many units are under development
by the leading national and regional
developers and provides valuable
benchmarks for the industry. The ranking
is based on the number of units started
in 2008. Separate lists reveal the Top 50
owners and the Top 10 firms completing
acquisitions.
The results are compiled from a voluntary
survey, so not all developers participate.
This year, 94 firms took part. All
developers are encouraged to take part
in next year’s survey to help generate the
most comprehensive list possible.
Who’s No. 1?
For the third consecutive year, The
NRP Group, Inc., was the nation’s most active
affordable housing developer, starting
16 projects with 1,437 units and completing
another 15 projects with 1,412 units in
2008.
The Cleveland-based firm hopes
to start another 15 developments this
year. “The biggest challenge in the last 12
months has been finding equity and debt
to finance the pipeline of projects in development,”
says Alan Scott, principal. “We
have succeeded in funding the bulk of our
deals and have moved mountains in the
process, including finding additional soft
dollars and incentives to overcome more
rigorous terms.”
The firm has made several moves
during this economic downturn, including
shifting its course “to include more affordable
projects and less conventional, where
equity and acceptable loan terms are nearly
impossible to find,” Scott says.
The Top 10 was comprised of eight
for-profit companies and two national
nonprofit organizations, National
Community Renaissance (CORE) at No.
3 and Volunteers of America at No. 5.
Overall, 35 for-profit companies, 13 nonprofi
t developers, and two public housing
authorities round out this year’s list.
The average number of units started
by the Top 50 firms last year is 469, and
the average number of completions is 428.
The largest owner remains The
Michaels Development Co., with a hefty
portfolio of 43,325 affordable units as of
Jan. 1. The firm is a big player in HOPE VI
developments across the country.
This year’s list of largest owners features
33 for-profit firms and 18 nonprofits.
Fifty-one firms make up the list because
two tied for the No. 42 spot.
Together, the group owns an impressive
419,136 affordable units across the
country.
How developers are responding
The tough conditions are forcing affordable
housing developers to take new
action.
Looking at the nearly 100 surveys
submitted, 22 developers reported cutting
expenses or working harder to collect rent
and other revenue. Fifteen developers said
they are nurturing the relationships they
have with their financing partners. Eleven
have instituted hiring or compensation
freezes. Developers also said they are taking
a harder look at proposed projects,
heightening their due diligence, and emphasizing
asset management.
These responses were to an openended
question about what they are doing
to cope with the economic downturn.
“We, like most other firms, have had
to do some belt-tightening, and we’ve
tried to do that carefully but actively,” says
Patrick Clancy, president and CEO of The
Community Builders, Inc., the No. 26 firm
on the developers list and the No. 21 owner.
“We’re also working to keep our friends
close but our bankers closer in an environment
where continuing change and uncertainty
in the financial sector impact daily
on what we’re able to accomplish.”
Columbia Residential in Atlanta is
putting more focus on administering its
property management operations and expanding
its geographic focus and revenue
sources, says Jim Grauley, president and
COO.
Holding the No. 11 spot on the developers
list and No. 34 on the owners
roll, Columbia closed three major mixedincome
transactions in the difficult fourth
quarter of 2008.
A few developers noted that they are
seeing new opportunities to acquire projects.
The decline in LIHTC equity has
been the biggest industry issue during the
past year. Developers received about $0.88
per dollar of tax credit on average in 2008.
They project prices to be significantly lower
this year, estimating that the same type of
deals will fetch only $0.75 in mid-2009.
When asked how the shortage in tax
credit equity is affecting their business, 28
of the 94 developers submitting surveys
said they have reduced or slowed their
project pipelines or plan to do so in the
future.
Developers also said they are focusing
on the strongest markets and the deals
that will appeal to investors.
Seeking other funding sources was
the third most popular response to the
open-ended question. Developers also said
they are value-engineering their developments
to meet today’s pricing realities. A
few have altered a project’s design to make
the deal pencil out.
|