Affordable Housing Finance
REGIONAL REPORT
Midwest
Midwest Developers
Struggle to Find Funds
AFFORDABLE HOUSING FINANCE
• November 2008
HFAs dish out new credits to close the gap
BY JERRY ASCIERTO
The capital markets meltdown
is affecting all sectors
of the affordable housing
industry, and nowhere is this
more evident than the
Midwest. For cities like Cleveland and
Detroit, foreclosures have been a fact of
life for years. But the foreclosure rate has
only accelerated in the last year, forcing
these areas to allocate more resources to
stabilize their hardest-hit communities.
The depressed low-income housing
tax credit (LIHTC) equity market is scuttling
deals left and right, especially in
rural areas that are unattractive to tax
credit investors, who are cherry-picking
only the most attractive urban deals.
Plus, many rural deals are out of the geographic
footprint of banks seeking to
meet their Community Reinvestment
Act requirements; without any investor
interest, these deals are foldng.
With the LIHTC market growing
more ugly by the day, developers need
more secondary financing. But the housing
trust funds in areas like Illinois and
Ohio are expected to face severe shortfalls
next year, as those states struggle
with budget difficulties.
In Ohio, five scattered-site redevelopments
of foreclosed and vacant properties
received tax credit allocations this
year. For the first time, the Ohio Housing
Finance Agency (OHFA) included language
in its 2008 qualified allocation
plan specifically addressing foreclosed
properties and relaxed certain requirements
to make tax credits more accessible.
In all, 199 foreclosed and vacant
homes will be rehabbed, with two initiatives
in Cleveland, two in Toledo, and one
in Dayton.
The federal housing bill signed in
July should help matters in the short
term. State housing finance agencies
(HFAs) received 10 percent additional
credits in 2008 and for 2009. Many
Midwest HFAs are providing equity supplements,
allocating the additional credits
to projects that received allocations
earlier this year, to help
make up for the equity shortfall.
Developers need all the
help they can get. In Ohio,
tax credits were pricing at
about 85 cents in May, but
OHFA was bracing for prices
in the mid-70-cent range in
its latest round of allocations.
Despite the grim
financing environment, good
projects are still getting
done. In Dayton, nonprofit
developer Miami Valley
Housing Opportunities
opened the doors in
September on Ohio Avenue
Commons, a 27-unit supportive-housing
facility. The $4 million development was
financed with nearly $3 million in
LIHTC and historic tax credit equity,
syndicated by Enterprise Community
Investment, Inc., and a host of secondary
financing, including city and county
funds.
Minneapolis-based Dominium
closed the financing on a new 37-unit 9
percent tax credit development called
Albertville Meadows Townhomes in late
September. The developer once favored
tax-exempt bond deals, but says 9 percent
deals are much easier to get done
now. “There is a strong aversion on the
demand side against bond deals right
now,” says Paul Sween, a principal at
Dominium. “There are some types of
deals, like a bond rehab in a rural area,
that just won’t get done now.”
Ohio is facing budget issues, causing
many to question whether the state’s
housing trust fund will be available to
developers next year. And Illinois’ housing
trust fund, seeded by a tax on real
estate transfers, is expected to be less
than robust next year since its transaction
volume has fallen significantly.
The Madison County Housing
Authority (MCHA) broke ground in
September on Meachum Crossing, a 78-
unit community on a redeveloped former
public housing site in Venice, Ill. MCHA
received about $500,000 in state housing
trust fund money, as well as 9 percent
equity pricing in the high $0.80 range.
The $15 million development received
about $11.7 million in LIHTC equity.
“The secondary financing that goes along
with these deals is very hard to get,” says
Dorothy Hummel, MCHA’s deputy director.
“But at the same time, there’s an endless
demand for affordable housing.”
|