HOUSING POLICYWASHINGTON
UPDATE Putting Final Touches on Housing BillAFFORDABLE
HOUSING FINANCE • July 2008 BY BARRY G. JACOBS
Legislators in the House and Senate are working on the pieces of what promises
to be a landmark housing bill, combining mortgage foreclosure relief, affordable
housing, Federal Housing Administration (FHA) modernization, government-sponsored
enterprise reform, and expanded tax incentives. While the administration
has issued a number of veto threats on individual bills, housing advocates are
optimistic that the president will sign the final package, especially since the
administration has been pushing hard for GSE reform and FHA modernization.
A key element in bills passed by the House (H.R. 3221) and approved by the Senate
Banking Committee is a $300 billion FHA refinancing program for homeowners facing
foreclosure because they cant afford their current mortgage payments.
Lenders that agree to participate in the program would have to accept a write-down
in the payoff of the existing loan. Under the House bill, the FHA loan would generally
be limited to 85 percent of the current property value, while under the Senate
legislation, it couldnt exceed the lesser of 90 percent of value or the
amount the borrower can repay. Both bills include safeguards designed to
exclude speculators and others who may deliberately default on their mortgages
in order to get out of a house whose value has plummeted. In addition, they have
provisions for the government to get some of its money back when the refinanced
homes are sold. Under the House bill, if there are sufficient sales proceeds,
the owner would pay an exit premium equal to the greater of 3 percent of the original
FHA refinancing mortgage amount or 100 percent of the net proceeds in the first
year. The amount would drop to 80 percent in the second year, 60 percent in the
third year, and 50 percent in the fourth and subsequent years. Under the
Senate measure, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) would get
a portion of the equity attributable to the write-down of the loan (100 percent
in the first year, scaling down to 60 percent in the fifth and later years) and
half of any appreciation in the value of the home. Both bills would establish
a Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) as the new regulator for Fannie Mae, Freddie
Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Banks. For Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the FHFA
would take over the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversights responsibility
for safety and soundness and HUDs responsibility for housing goals and new
programs. In addition, the legislation would create new affordable housing
funding requirements for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The House bill would require
the two corporations to make annual contributions equal to 1.2 basis points for
each dollar in their mortgage portfolios to an affordable housing fund to be operated
by the FHFA. The funding requirement would be limited to the 2008-2012 period.
The Senate bill, on the other hand, would create a permanent annual funding requirement
equal to 4.2 basis points for each dollar of the unpaid principal balance in new
business purchases, with 65 percent of the money to go to HUD for a housing trust
fund and 35 percent to the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund.
Once in that fund, the cash would be used for a capital magnet fund to attract
private capital for economic development and affordable housing activities.
The housing trust fund could also receive money from other sources approved by
Congress, such as the FHA and appropriated funds. As a result, the fund would
be similar in structure to the national affordable housing fund approved by the
House in a separate bill (H.R. 2895) that wasnt rolled into the broader
House foreclosure relief legislation. Over the 2009-2011 period, however,
a portion of the Fannie Mae-Freddie Mac funding contributions would be set aside
to cover any losses from the FHA refinancing program. Additional elements
of separate House and Senate bills that could be part of an omnibus bill include
FHA modernization, which would revise downpayment and mortgage insurance requirements
and restructure the FHA Title I manufactured housing loan program; tax incentives,
including temporary expansion of the lowincome housing tax credit and housing
bond programs, with authorization to use bond proceeds to refinance subprime home
mortgages and tax credits for homebuyers; and funding for state and local governments
to acquire and rehabilitate vacant foreclosed homes. Keeping disaster subsidies
in place HUD wont phase down subsidies for some families participating
in the disaster housing assistance program (DHAP) for victims of hurricanes Katrina
and Rita. DHAP provides aid for families who originally received post-hurricane
housing assistance from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Original
program guidance provided for incremental subsidy reductions of $50 per month
through the end of DHAP March 1, 2009. Most families will still see their
subsidies phased down under that schedule. However, in Notice PIH 2008-21, HUD
announced that it wont reduce assistance for families moving from FEMA housing
during the DHAP transition period, including those vacating travel trailers and
mobile homes because of formaldehyde problems. Subprime refinancings a
possibility Federal Home Loan Banks could set up programs to provide relief
to struggling homeowners by restructuring or refinancing subprime or nontraditional
mortgages under proposed revisions to the Federal Housing Finance Board affordable
housing program regulations. To be eligible for refinancing or restructuring,
a loan would have to be an adjustable-rate mortgage on the borrowers principal
residence that was originated on or before July 20, 2007. The loan would
have to have gone through, or be scheduled for, a rate adjustment or recasting
of principal and interest that would result in housing costs exceeding 45 percent
of the familys income. The family could not have more than $35,000 in financial
assets, with certain exceptions, and its equity in the home could not be more
than $50,000 or 20 percent of the appraised value, whichever is higher.
The refinanced or restructured mortgage would have to be a fixed-rate loan with
a minimum term of 30 years, a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 97 percent, and an
interest rate no higher than the average rate in Freddie Macs weekly mortgage
market survey. Veterans voucher policy changes HUD has developed
policies for the Sec. 8 Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (VASH) voucher program,
which will provide housing assistance for homeless veterans receiving services
from a VA medical center. Based on instructions in the fiscal 2008 appropriations
bill, which provided $75 million for the program, HUD has waived the basic VASH
requirement that participating homeless veterans must suffer from chronic mental
illness or substance use disorders. Admissions to the VASH program wont
be subject to the general Sec. 8 tenantbased assistance targeting requirements
for households with incomes no higher than 30 percent of area median income. However,
VASH participants within that income range can count toward the target.
Public housing authorities (PHAs) wont be able to establish separate waiting
lists or local preferences for VASH participants because they will be referred
to the PHAs by the VA medial centers providing the services. In addition,
PHAs wont be able to deny VASH assistance because of violations of voucher
program rules or for alcohol abuse or criminal activity. However, the ban on housing
assistance if a household member is subject to a lifetime sex offender registration
requirement will still apply. Barry G. Jacobs is editor of Housing
and Development Reporter, the nations premier source for in-depth, factual
coverage of all aspects of affordable housing and community development. The twopart
publication includes informed reports and insightful analyses in HDR Current
Developments, and an always up-to-date compilation of essential documents
in the HDR Reference Files. Jacobs is also the author of the annually
updated HDR Handbook of Housing and Development Law. For more information,
call (800) 723-8077. |