Apartment Finance
Today
Bottom Line
Condo Reversions
Turnaround Maneuver
APARTMENT FINANCE TODAY • September/October 2009
In the right situations, reversions can work.
BY Les Shaver
 Back to Rentals: After seeing the
220-unit Grove East struggle as
a workforce, for-sale project in
Plantation, Fla., The Altman Cos.
brought the property back to
the rental market. The strategy
worked: By May 2009, the $33
million, mixed-use project exceeded
90 percent occupancy. Photo: The Altman Cos.
JOEL ALTMAN SAW the other shoe
before it dropped. Though sales seemed
to be holding strong at his 220-unit Grove
East workforce project in Plantation, Fla.,
he knew he was in trouble when the real
estate market started to crash in 2006.
“We suspected that it was going to be
a lot of defaults because the single-family
builders, like Lennar and Centex , were
selling two-bedroom, two-and-a-halfbathroom,
1,400-square-foot townhomes
for $179,900,” says the CEO of Boca Raton,
Fla.-based developer The Altman Cos . “We
knew that if our one-bedroom units were
$179,900, then there was no way we were
going to back fill with 50 percent or 60
percent defaults.”
Altman was right. Buyers fled the project.
But fortunately, in this case, Altman’s
costs were low enough that he could go to
Plan B—reworking his loan and turning
Grove East into a rental community . In
this case, the gambit succeeded. By May of
2009, the $33 million, mixed-use project
exceeded 90 percent occupancy.
Altman is one of the lucky ones. He has
turned his for-sale units into rentals and
even collected some that he had originally
sold. “We bought the closed units and converted
[the building] to a rental,” he says.
“Whatever inventory we didn’t have sold,
we rented.”
Grove East isn’t alone. Jack McCabe,
CEO of Deerfield Beach, Fla.-based Mc-
Cabe Research and Consulting, says about
62,000 units were converted to condos
in Florida (a whopping 37 percent of the
inventory in the Sunshine State). Now,
about 16,000 units, or more than a quarter
of those units, have been forced to reenter
the rental pool. That doesn’t include a host
of other rental units, including a smaller
block of individual units and rental agency
programs, which are virtually impossible
to track.
Unfortunately, most developers and
converters are so far underwater that
they can’t rent out their unsold inventory,
much less buy back sold inventory and
rent it. That leaves behind investors who
see opportunity but still have doubts about
buying units with a large number of owner-occupants.
For that reason, right now,
when it comes to condo reversions, smaller
deals hold the most promise.
A Difficult Path
Whether you’re a converter or investor,
trying to make an opportunistic play by turning a for-sale deal into a rental isn’t
easy. “Everyone talks about doing reversions,
but you really have to have some
guts [to do it],” says Alan Kaye , multifamily
director of Coldwell Banker Commercial
in Boca Raton.
The Obstacles
Owners need to keep
these three things in mind
during the condo reversion
process.
1. The property’s age. “It has to
be 1995 or newer,” says Peter
Zalewski, a principal with Condo
Vultures , a Bal Harbour, Fla.-based
consultancy. “If it was built before
1995, it will probably be a pretty
hard sell to investors. There’s so
much product out there, people
are opting for the quality [of newer
product].” 2. The number of owners unwilling
to sell. “Owners that
bought may want to live in that unit,
even though the developer is way
underwater,” says Adam Cappel,
president of CondoReports.com,
a Miami-based market intelligence
firm. “They might not care, and they
might have bought all cash.”
3. The high cost of association
dues. “Unless you can find a
way to deal with the association
fees, or you’re in a very low-priced
product, it’s hard,” says Joel Altman,
CEO of Boca Raton, Fla.-based
developer The Altman Cos. “You
couldn’t buy some of these larger
units selling $500,000 to $600,000
and be able to rent them and make
any sense of it. The association fees
still will be somewhat problematic.”
First, developers, who have underwritten
the land or building at for-sale prices,
make a cost basis that is too high to make
the deal work as a rental. Often, that deal
then ends up with the bank.
“The developers have put more energy
and focus into marketing, renting, and finishing
their developer units,” says Andres
Lemos , principal of Miami-based multifamily
marketing and investment firm
Miami Waterview Properties . “A lot of
these units were decorator-ready. They’re
working on making the places inhabitable
so they can actually rent them.”
For people who bought apartments to
upgrade them to condos, the process is
different. But there are still challenges. “A
lot of them bought the occupancy so they
could do improvements to get them in
a for-sale-like condition with new appliances,
carpets, and floor covering,” says
Marc deBaptiste , a principal in the Boca
Raton office of multifamily brokerage firm
Apartment Realty Advisors . “Now, they are
forced to get back into the rental business.”
In many cases, the distressed
rental units owned by the converters
and builders—and even the building’s
investors—end up with the bank, which
gives vultures an opportunity to swoop in
and do the reversion. But some of those
buyers are concerned about potential
trouble ahead.
“A lot of people aren’t really interested
in buying up the blocks of inventory
unless they can get control in a large
percentage of the building,” says Adam
Cappel , president of Miami-based market
intelligence firm CondoReports.com . “If it
sold 150 units and you can buy the other
150 in block, you have to assemble the rest
of the units. It’s kind of a nightmare.”
But they may look at deals where a
smaller percentage of the units have sold.
“It’s happening in select deals where a
smaller percentage [of units] was sold to
individuals,” Cappel says. “You have to
buy the block of units that are under bulk
ownership. It’s hard to make that work.”
The Opportunity
In smaller doses, however, investors
are interested in doing reversions ,
says Peter Zalewski , a principal with
Condo Vultures , a Bal Harbour, Fla.-based
consultancy. “We’ve been approached by
groups where no more than 10 percent of
the project has been sold,” he says. “Then
they want to buy the note and do what
they need to do. They ultimately try to
buy these individual units on a case-bycase
basis.”
Kaye has a similar story with one
buyer he works with. Again, patience is
the key. “He’s buying a minority of the
units. Over time, he’ll acquire one-off and
small blocks of other units,” Kaye says.
“He will try to build a critical mass [of
units] in that complex.”
Zalewski has generally seen one group
approach him for broken condos. “It will
be the private equity-type buyer, rather
than the institutional-type buyer,” he
says. “Institutional buyers will not do all
of that stuff. The private equity is saying
they can move in there, and if they get
$20 million or $15 million, they buy it,
put in some sweat equity, and in three to
five years, they may look like rock stars.”
The potential for stardom is there.
Kaye is seeing some late ’80s deals sold
for $30 a foot. With that kind of pricing,
he sees some investors dealing with the
hassle of individual unit owners. “I believe
some people will make a ton of money in
the next couple of years by buying these
units, dealing with the failed HOA [home
owners’ association], and bringing it back.
And they’re going to have a phenomenal
product at a very low cost-per-foot,” Kaye
says. “You can’t beat the replacement costs
that are available today, but you need to
have the temperament to deal with the
problems with units.”
And there are ways to do this. For
instance, in many of the investor-soaked
markets, units will end up with banks. If
you know the bank, you can then start
accumulating rentals. “Let’s say that up
to 50 percent of those buyers might have
been investors anyhow; they’re going
through short sales right now with their
lenders,” Kaye says.
Another place to look is at the HOAs.
If it’s in trouble, the condos could come
a lot cheaper. “A lot of those investorowned
units sold may not be paying HOA
dues or real estate taxes,” Kaye says. “It’s
causing a burden on the property. A lot of
people are selling off these units at fairly
deep discounts.”
|