Apartment Finance
Today
Capital Markets
Equity Investment
Waiting to Pounce
APARTMENT FINANCE TODAY • November/December 2009
Waiting to Pounce
Institutional equity waits for the distress call, while private equity scoops up assets
from the bigger fish.
BY jerry ascierto
CASH IS KING, BUT THE KING has left
the building.
The equity market has grown more
constrained this year, as pension funds, life
insurance companies, and other institutions
stay on the sidelines waiting for a
bigger volume of distressed assets to hit the
streets.
Most of the equity funds being raised
are focused on distressed properties and
distressed debt note acquisitions, also
called “loan to own” acquisitions. While
many older opportunity funds are increasingly
seeing investors pulling their commitments,
new institutional equity funds
anticipating distressed acquisitions are
closing every week.
“The reason they’re not more active is
that there just aren’t the opportunities that
yield the kind of returns that they’re looking
for at this stage,” says John Fenoglio, a
senior vice president focused on the equity
market for Charlotte, N.C.-based Grandbridge
Real Estate Capital. “But there’s a
mountain of money being created on the
sidelines. The distress is building, and the
number of loans going into special servicing
is rapidly escalating, so the product will
be there eventually.”
Return expectations from institutional
equity providers now run from
the mid-teens to 25 percent, an increase
of 300 to 500 basis points (bps) since
mid-2008. But the most active buyers today
are private, regional players scooping
up assets from larger institutions.
New Targets
Today’s buyers are overwhelmingly
targeting cash-on-cash returns. In the
past, buyers assumed that at least half of
their internal rate of return would come
when the asset was sold five years down
the road. But buyers are now expecting to
make hefty returns on cash flow.
Underwriting on equity deals has also
grown more conservative, especially concerning
rent growth assumptions. And exit
cap rate assumptions—or where cap rates
will be when the buyer becomes a seller—
are increasingly being scrutinized.
Those pension funds, hedge funds,
and opportunity funds that are active are
looking for a hold period of around three
to five years. “If something takes more
than a few years to get done, it’s too hard
to handicap whether it’s ever going to get
done, and it starts to dilute the returns the
longer you hold it,” says Dennis Walsh, a
senior director of Boston-based Tremont
Realty Capital, which provides preferred
equity and advises on common or joint
venture equity. “If you can’t realize that
value over a three- to five-year window, it’s
a deal that won’t pencil for them.”
CUMULATIVE DISTRESS IN
U.S. MULTIFAMILYMonth (2009)
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August Dollars (in billions)
$11.77
$13.70
$15.97
$17.05
$18.32
$19.95
$20.95
$22.07
Source: Real Capital Analytics
A Second Look
Much like trying to find debt for transitional
deals (such as new construction or
substantial rehabilitation), joint venture
equity, particularly for development work,
is increasingly harder to find. Smaller developers
working on one-off deals will still
find their best success in raising “friends
and family” equity. But striking a relationship
with an equity provider on a series of
deals is possible for vertically integrated
companies.
Since institutional equity providers
prefer larger deals, developers looking for
less than $3 million in equity, for example,
have a hard time getting their attention.
But if a firm can handle seven deals a year
“then the amount of equity inches up in the aggregate of $20 million to $30 million
over 12 months, and it hits the threshold
where it makes sense,” Walsh says.
Key to these types of deals is a structure
that includes fairly big overhead
costs, such as in-house construction,
leasing, inspection, and engineering expertise.
A single developer hiring several
third-party providers is not as attractive
to equity providers.
These “first look” agreements, which
were popular in the 1990s, may be coming
back in style. Such agreements require
the developer to give the equity provider
first dibs on any of its deals, and if the
equity provider says no, the developer
is free to get it elsewhere. Tremont has
arranged several joint ventures between
regional developers and institutional equity
providers, and the company believes
that model will become increasingly
popular as access to equity continues to
be constrained.
Currency Exchange
Industry watchers also expect foreign
equity sources to be more active in the
fourth quarter and throughout the first
half of 2010. A mid-year survey by the
Association of Foreign Investors in Real
Estate found that 75 percent of its membership
sat out the first half of 2009, but
about 66 percent expected to be active
investors in the second half.
Consider that Highlands Ranch, Colo.-
based UDR recently announced a joint
venture with Kuwait Finance House to
invest up to $450 million in multifamily
assets. The company said it had actively
been exploring joint venture opportunities
for the last two years, but that return
expectations were too high to pencil out.
But the pendulum is swinging back,
according to Warren Troupe, a senior
executive vice president at UDR who said
investors are now starting to lower their
expectations to a more realistic realm. “In
the past four months, we started to get a
lot of traction from institutional investors
who had been in the multifamily market
and exited in 2006 or early 2007.”
China Investment Corp. (CIC), a $300
billion sovereign wealth fund, is also
looking to make a big splash in the U.S.
commercial real estate markets. CIC met
with private equity managers such as
BlackRock and Invesco in late summer
2009 about opportunities in distressed
mortgage notes as well as physical assets.
Last year, CIC invested just $4.8 billion in
global financial markets, but this year, it
has invested as much in a single month.
—Additional reporting by Les Shaver
|