Apartment Finance
Today
special focus
capital markets outlook 2009
Cranes Gather Dust
APARTMENT FINANCE TODAY • January/February 2009
Construction financing will be the most constrained
loan type in 2009.
By JERRY ASCIERTO
Construction financing
was the toughest
nut to crack in 2008.
And it will get no easier in
2009.
The rash of bank failures in the
third and fourth quarters included
some of the multifamily industry’s largest
lenders, like Wachovia and Washington
Mutual, and many expect more
breakdowns in the first half of 2009.
Local and regional banks will
continue to conservatively fund some
projects in 2009, but preference will
be given to developers that have longstanding
relationships with those
banks. The financial strength and
experience of sponsors will be more
important than in recent years to procure
financing.
The largest remaining lenders are
expected to whittle down their commercial
real estate exposure in 2009,
targeting only the strongest deals. And
in late 2008, many banks were earmarking
their construction capital to
rescue distressed developments, rather
than fund new ground-up ventures.
“You’re going to see more shrinking
of commercial real estate balance
sheets on the banking side rather than
expansion in 2009,” says Phil Melton,
a senior vice president at Grandbridge
Real Estate Capital, a subsidiary of
BB&T Bank.
Terms tighten
Underwriting standards for construction
loans continued to grow
more conservative at the end of 2008.
Loan-to-value (LTV) ratios dropped
from 80 percent to the 70 percent
range over the year, and
debt-service coverage
ratios rose to a minimum
1.25x.
LTV ratios will likely
continue to contract in
2009, requiring developers
to find more
equity to make deals
pencil out. But equity
providers are now
charging upward of 20
percent, a trend likely to
worsen in 2009.
Like most banks,
KeyBank Real Estate Capital’s Income
Property Group has grown much more
selective in its construction lending.
Multifamily is its preferred asset
type—about 40 percent of its portfolio
is multifamily—even more so now
since Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
continue to provide a permanent loan
“exit strategy.”
But it will only choose the best
projects from developers with whom it
has a deep relationship.
“We’re going to allocate our capital
to drive it to those clients that do
everything with us,” says Christa
Chambers, a senior vice president of
KeyBank’s Income Property Group.
The London Interbank Offered Rate
(LIBOR), the benchmark used to set
construction loans, was about 1.9 percent
in early December. Spreads were
averaging around 350 basis points, for
relatively attractive all-in rates in the
mid-5 percent range. “I don’t think the
risk is being priced, so that’s why we
need to make it up with deposits or
permanent loan fees,” says Chambers.
KeyBank’s construction loan
volume for commercial real estate
was down about 75 percent in 2008
compared with 2007. Like most banks,
Key is hoping to hold steady or even
whittle down its commercial real
estate exposure in 2009.
Some banks have begun offering
interest-rate “floors” on a case-by-case
basis, to protect their spread and make
construction loans a more attractive
investment. LIBOR fluctuated wildly
over the last year, making floating-rate
construction loans very unpredictable.
In December 2007, the 30-day
LIBOR averaged 5 percent, but a year
later, it was down to around 1.9 percent.
So banks are now offering all-in
interest-rate floors, which no construction
loan can go below regardless
of what happens with LIBOR.
Since LIBOR is set by a European
banking community that had its share
of struggles in 2008, many believe the
wild ride is far from over. “The future
short-term outlook for LIBOR is questionable,”
says David Cardwell, vice
president of capital markets at the National
Multi Housing Council. “I don’t
have a lot of confidence in markets that
are set by the banks right now.”
|